This post is from Alison Eitel, language arts teacher at High School South
____________________________________________________
 |
Students in the driver's seat:
Students choose the output option that best reflects their new learning. |
NEW UNDERSTANDINGS
As an English teacher, I am
constantly having to make decisions about what I will teach, and what I will
leave out. There is simply not enough time to say everything there is
to say about a text in the time allotted. This was no different for my
unit on The Crucible. As we finished reading the play in LA II
Honors, I bemoaned all that my class had not had time to explore
together. But my students are bright and motivated, and I wanted to give
them a chance to reach some self-directed, deeper understandings of the text on
their own, without large class instruction.
For their final assessment, I
devised a group project in which they would be able to a) complete a
supplementary reading dealing one facet of the text, b) discuss the reading
with a small group, c) reexamine The Crucible through this new lens, and
d) create a "new text" synthesizing themes and ideas for both their
article and The Crucible. This "new text" would
demonstrate their developed understanding of the play and I hoped would be a
format to share with and engage the larger class.
 |
| ...and students research digitally. |
 |
| Students research in print... |
SUPPORTING STUDENTS' CHOICES
I provided each group with a
selection of supplementary articles to choose from based on their collective
interest. This would be their “input.” I also gave them a
list of genres to consider for their ‘output.” The list included:
- a
simulation of a Time magazine
- a tabloid
- a newscast
- a digital archive
- or a
character blog.
I conferenced with groups individually to ensure they were
digesting the articles and moving forward in their knowledge of the texts.
Once they had some new understandings of both their article and The
Crucible, I encouraged them to think about which genre might best frame their
ideas and to select a format for their output that they were already
somewhat experts in. (This way they would be able to filter their new
understanding into a familiar format, and I didn’t have to teach into these
genres too much.) Nonetheless, I did require them to examine real-life
versions of these genres--Time editions, blogs, and tabloids-- in order
to accurately simulate this genre.
 |
Students work in Google Docs to collaboratively
plan their projects. |
FINAL PROJECTS
For the final product, students
presented their new texts to the class and shared their new
understanding. Students were encouraged to think of how they might not
just tell the class what they did, but actually teach the class about their new
understanding, inviting their classmates to share in their new knowledge.
Many of the projects were quite impressive, as the students used their
individual creative strengths to communicate their new learning. I saw
everything from:
- live newscasts at the scene of the witch trials
- twitter
feeds featuring Abigail Williams stalking John Proctor
- Proctor as Time
Magazine's "Tragic Hero of the Year."
The students had a lot of fun
creating these new texts and exploring The Crucible in a new way.
This is my second year doing
this project, and this year I made several changes to guide the students
along. It is still far from perfect, and I have a host of ideas for
revising next year. But overall, students responded positively to both the
freedom to pursue their groups' interests and the creative choice. We all
agreed that it was an authentic assessment of their learning, and it was a lot
of fun!
~Alison
AN EXAMPLE OF STUDENT WORK: